2026-11-04 19:04 UTC
I appreciate you’re engaging with the question and I’d urge you to keep going.
Here’s a thought experiment: imagine if the only other animals in the planet were other primates, maybe even just Neanderthals. Maybe we are them in the past, maybe some people still do today. Maybe they’re even farmed. Trapped and milked, or fed and butchered. But it’s all far away from the city, so you don’t even have to think about it, you just go to the back of the store and get your meat or your cheese.
But they are actually people. Not like you and me, sure, but they undeniably have a conscious experience of the world very very similar to ours.
You don’t actually need to eat their body parts or their milk. You can survive just fine without them, it just takes some effort, and most people don’t bother.
Would it still be morally irrelevant whether you ate that meat or not?
Replies (1)
-
@EloySg@lemmy.zip 2026-11-04 20:43
It would be more of a thing about sappiency and about their own culture, even considering they could be wildly diferent to us in biology, they could be cephalopods,birds, bears or even plants or funghi,yes, we can survive without them. My principal point is that que are already asuming too many things about those other sapient beings: -theyre animals that cannot reproduce sexualy vía grafts -they have the same fear death than western people -they may not have canibalistic customs about themselves And we dont even know if there IS a being that is like that