#antinatalism

3 posts · Last used Aug 31

There is no radically transforming society without individuals radically transforming themselves. And while it's the simplest step to take, the biggest attitude shift is respecting the rights of non-human animals. Not you offering help, being jolly during difficult times, nothing like that. Just basic respect. And I would claim that believing society can be radically transformed is naive, just stop abusing beings for their sake. #Vegan #Veganism #Speciesism #Antispeciesism #Society #Antinatalism #BeVegan #GoVegan :vegan:
3
0
2
0
“There is nothing to be got in the world anywhere; privation and pain pervade it, and boredom lies in wait at every corner for those who have escaped them. Moreover, wickedness usually reigns, and folly does all the talking. Fate is cruel, and human beings are pathetic.” —Arthur Schopenhauer, Parerga and Paralipomena #Philosophy #Quotes #PhilosophicalPessimism #Pessimism #Nihilism #Antinatalism #ArthurSchopenhauer
1
0
7
0
No One Is Infrastructure https://nume.ca/blog/no-one-is-infrastructure Antinatalism asks whether the act of creating a life can be answerable, in advance, to the subject it brings into existence. No One Is Infrastructure places alongside that question a diagnosis of relations in which subjects of experience—beings who can feel, suffer, want or fear—are positioned as support for projects not genuinely answerable to their good and standing. The essay develops two related but distinct moral structures: unauthorizable creation, in which an initiating act creates a subject without any prior subject to whom that act could answer; and infrastructuralization, in which a subject is organized as property, supply, reproductive capacity, labour, administratively legible material or expendable means. Its central distinction is between a subject's welfare and a subject's standing: better treatment within a relation may mitigate harm without altering its orientation toward another's project, and goods or endorsement arising within a created life do not by themselves repair the absence of originating answerability. Within the answerability framework the essay adopts, the remaining antinatalist dispute is whether independent justifications — impersonal value, permissible risk, or agent-relative reasons — can override the originating objection, since downstream goods cannot. Institutional pronatalism and breeding-based animal agriculture emerge as convergence cases in which creation lacking prior answerability is joined to organization for use. Labour under survival pressure, state legibility, gendered care and political violence appear as further sites where the same diagnostic question recurs. Distinguishing fiduciary care for existing dependent subjects from the reciprocal public justification required of institutions, the essay argues that a politics against infrastructuralization must not reproduce it by manufacturing victims for liberatory ends. It offers not a doctrine or synthesis, but a recurring question: who is being asked to carry a world they did not choose? #Antinatalism #Vegan #Anarchism #Feminism
1
0
5
0